POLICY STATEMENT

Artificial Intelligence and Creative Works**

I. Technological Context

We operate in an AI‑enabled world.

Many musical, visual, and narrative functions can now be executed through simple computational means.

This reality is acknowledged without resistance or nostalgia.

Technology expands capacity; it does not redefine origin.

---

II. Central Invariant: The Artist

Architecture may scale.

Tools may accelerate production.

Capabilities may proliferate.

The invariant remains the artist and the originating intellectual property.

Creative works arise from human authorship.

That authorship retains moral, legal, and economic significance regardless of technological mediation.

No system, however capable, may substitute for the originating mind.

---

III. Boundaries of Use

AI systems must not ingest, reproduce, or derive from copyrighted material without:

• Authorization

• Transparency

• Respect for rights holders

Technological capability does not override consent.

Automation does not dissolve ownership.

Scale does not erase provenance.

---

IV. Structural Position

Architecture exists to highlight the invariant, not to obscure it.

In creative systems, the invariant is the artist.

AI may assist creation.

AI may extend technique.

AI may operationalize workflow.

AI may not displace authorship, claim origin, or appropriate lineage.

The system is a tool.

The artist is the source.

---

V